Tool 11

Student Profiles for Alternate Assessment Decision Making


Kathy Strunk, Sheryl S. Lazarus, Martha L. Thurlow, and Mari Quanbeck

A publication of
NATIONAL CENTER ON EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES

In collaboration with
NCEO’s 1.0% Community of Practice (CoP)

The Center is supported through a Cooperative Agreement (#H326G160001) with the Research to Practice Division, Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education. The Center is affiliated with the Institute on Community Integration at the College of Education and Human Development, University of Minnesota. The contents of this report were developed under the Cooperative Agreement from the U.S. Department of Education, but does not necessarily represent the policy or opinions of the U.S. Department of Education or Offices within it. Readers should not assume endorsement by the federal government.

Project Officer: David Egnor

All rights reserved. Any or all portions of this document may be reproduced and distributed without prior permission, provided the source is cited as:

Strunk, K., Lazarus, S. S., Thurlow, M. L., & Quanbeck, M. (2021). Student profile examples for determining eligibility for alternate assessments. National Center on Educational Outcomes.

Acknowledgments

This resource was developed through a truly collaborative process with the 48 states participating in the 1% Cap Community of Practice (CoP) during its bi-weekly webinar calls in 2020. Although the CoP was formed at the request of states to provide them the opportunity for private state conversations, it was with mutual agreement among the CoP members that this report should be shared publicly on the NCEO website.

The states participating in the 1% Cap CoP are listed here. Many of the states had multiple representatives on the CoP webinar calls. This resource would not exist had it not been for their active participation and sharing during the CoP calls.

 

Student Profiles for Alternate Assessment Decision Making

Most states and districts provide training that aims to help individualized education program (IEP) teams make appropriate decisions about student participation in the alternate assessment. IEP teams use the state’s alternate assessment participation criteria and consider the unique characteristics of each student as they make these decisions. Some states use student profile examples in these trainings. Aspects of student profile examples are often highlighted to indicate whether students meet or do not meet the state’s criteria. Trainees can learn to identify the pieces of a student’s profile or IEP that help inform appropriate participation decisions. This resource was developed in response to the National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO) 1% Community of Practice’s (CoP’s) interest in having student profile examples they could use in their training materials.

CoP members nominated some of the student profiles in this tool; others were identified through searches of state websites. The profiles are organized by state, school level, and disability. The names of states’ disability categories may vary. Some state profiles indicated that a student had a mild mental disability, moderate intellectual disability, functional mental disability, or cognitive impairment; in this resource these three groups are included in the “intellectual disability” category.

Table 1 provides a listing of student profiles from states, which are listed in alphabetical order. When using these profiles, states or districts may wish to customize the profile to align with their state disability categories. For each profile, the name of an assessment (alternate or general) is provided in bold in parentheses following the student’s age, grade, and disability to indicate the assessment participation decision for the student. Many states did not indicate a decision about the assessment in which the student should most likely participate. For those student profiles, NCEO added the assessment information because NCEO believes it is helpful to indicate whether the information about the student seems to point to a decision for the student to participate in the alternate assessment or in the general assessment. States were given an opportunity to verify that NCEO had correctly categorized assessment participation decisions for their state. If a state indicated that NCEO had not appropriately categorized a student profile, the information in the table was changed. For training purposes, states or districts may want to foster discussion about the student rather than provide the suggested assessment participation decision provided in Table 1.

 

Table 1. Student Profiles by State

State Links and Details
Alabama

https://www.alsde.edu/sec/ses/Assessment/Power%20Point%20Presentation%20for%20Training.pptx

  • Open PowerPoint. See slides #15-#24.
    • Monique,13-year-old 7th grader with intellectual disability–middle school (alternate)
      • Includes information about special education services received and placement
      • Includes information about communication, adaptive behavior, and intelligence
      • Includes information about parent input
      • Includes information about academic content
  • https://www.alsde.edu/sec/ses/Pages/assessment-all.aspx?navtext=Assessment
  • Select “1%” Tab located at the top on the right.
  • Select Mateo case study example, the 7th item in left hand column
    • Mateo, 9-year-old 4th grader with autism spectrum disorder–elementary (alternate)
      • Includes information about special education services received and placement
      • Includes information about communication, adaptive behavior, and intelligence
      • Includes information about parent input
      • Includes information about academic content
Arizona

https://cms.azed.gov/home/GetDocumentFile?id=5e138e2003e2b31afcf54b19

Open PowerPoint (“Determining Eligibility for Alternate Assessment”). See slides #15-#19.

  • 7th grader with autism spectrum disorder–middle school (slide #15) [insufficient information to make an assessment determination; could presume general]
    • Includes information about cognitive and academic scores
    • Includes information about IEP goals
  • 2nd grader with developmental delay–elementary (slide #16) [insufficient information to make a determination, re-evaluate before grade 3]
    • Includes information about behavior
  • 5th grader1 with specific learning disability–elementary (slide #17) [insufficient information to make a determination, could presume general, specific learning disability is not a typical disability category for the alternate]
    • Includes information about special education services received
    • Includes information about parent input
  • 10th grader with moderate intellectual disability and speech/language impairment (multiple disabilities)–high school (slide #18) [alternate]
    • Includes information about cognitive, academic, and adaptive scores
    • Includes information about placement
    • Includes information about past history of assessments
  • 4th grade English learner with disabilities–elementary (slide #19) [insufficient information to make a determination, gather documentation that addresses eligibility criteria]
    • Includes information about IEP goals
    • Includes information about past history of assessments
Georgia

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1ifHUxV3cDV_i3ScaqutfpZGcdLKTpHzp?usp=sharing

  • Profile developed by state and not available on public website
  • Open Google Drive folder with Martha Case study example (provided as a Google doc and as a PDF)
    • Martha, 12-year-old 6th grader with mild intellectual disability and speech/language impairment–middle school (alternate)
      • Includes information about special education services received and placement
      • Includes information about communication
      • Includes information about psychological scores
      • Includes information about parent input
Hawaii

https://hsa-alt.alohahsap.org/core/fileparse.php/3344/urlt/HSA_Alt_Participation_Guidelines_Examples_2020-2021.pdf

  • Handout (“HAS-Alt Participation Guidelines–Decision Making Questions and Case Study Examples”) with ten brief examples beginning on p. #2
  • Disabilities are not clearly identified for every case
    • Sandra, 13-year-old-middle school (p. #2) [alternate]
      • Includes information about academics
    • Roger, 13-year-old-middle school (p. #2) [general]
      • Includes information about communication
      • Includes information about academics
    • Raymond, 7th grader-middle school (p. #3) [alternate]
      • Includes information about academics
      • Includes information about special education services required
    • Sylvia, undisclosed age (p. #3) [general with accommodations]
      • Includes information about instructional supports required
    • Jackson, 9-year-old-elementary school (p.#3) [general with no accommodations]
      • Includes information about academics
    • Caroline, 8th grader-middle school (p. #3) [alternate]
      • Includes information about academics
      • Includes information about accommodations and modifications
    • Wilson, 8th grader-middle school (p. #3) [general with accommodations]
      • Includes information about adaptations
    • Paul, 11th grader-high school (p. #4) [on the cusp, IEP team gathering additional information]
      • Includes information about academics
      • Includes information about accommodations and supports
    • Rochelle, undisclosed age (p. #4) [general]
      • Includes information about impairments
      • Includes information about learning characteristics
    • Josie, undisclosed age (p. #4) [general]
      • Includes information about medical history
      • Includes information about past performance on assessments
Kentucky

https://www.hdilearning.org

  • Training site

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1U4H6cIoAQHcm5T9cirdBlgEhkhYfUvOw?usp=sharing
To access the profiles go to this Google Drive link. (If the link does not work, cut and paste it into browser.)

  • Google Drive folder with 8 subfolders contains cases pulled from training. Each subfolder has 3 files: a narrative, data analysis, and participation guidelines.
    • Candace, 8-year-old 3rd grader with mild mental disability–elementary (general with accommodations)
      • Includes information about special education services received and placement
      • Includes information about accommodations and supports
      • Includes adaptive and cognitive functioning scores
      • Includes information about parent input
    • Hunter, 16-year-old 10th grader with multiple disabilities–high school (alternate)
      • Includes information about special education services received and placement
      • Includes information about communication
      • Includes information about academics
    • Mateo, 9-year-old 4th grader with autism spectrum disorder–elementary (alternate)
      • Includes information about special education services received and placement
      • Includes adaptive and cognitive functioning scores
      • Includes information about parent input
    • Monique, 13-year-old 7th grader with functional mental disabilities–middle school (alternate)
      • Includes information about special education services received and placement
      • Includes adaptive and cognitive functioning scores
      • Includes information about parent input
    • Nathan, 8-year-old 3rd grader with mild mental disability–elementary (alternate)
      • Includes information about special education services and placement
      • Includes adaptive and cognitive functioning scores
      • Includes information about parent input
    • Robert, 13-year-old 8th grader with mild mental disability–middle school (general with accommodations)
      • Includes information about special education services received and placement
      • Includes information about accommodations and supports
      • Includes adaptive and cognitive functioning scores
      • Includes information about parent input
    • Sophia, 10-year-old 5th grader with mild mental disability–elementary (general with accommodations)
      • Includes information about special education services and placement
      • Includes adaptive and cognitive functioning scores
      • Includes information about parent input
      • English learner
    • Steven, 12-year-old 6th grader with autism spectrum disorder–middle school (alternate)
      • Includes information about special education services received and placement
      • Includes adaptive and cognitive functioning scores
      • Includes information about parent input
Louisiana

https://louisianabelieves.com/docs/default-source/students-with-disabilities/2019-tl-alternate-assessment-comprehensive-handout.pdf?sfvrsn=ff4a9d1f_4

  • See pages 3–5 of the PDF file
    • 9-year-old 3rd grade female receiving most services in a separate setting–elementary (p. #3) [alternate]
      • Includes information on content and standards
      • Includes adaptive and cognitive functioning scores
      • Includes information on communication
    • 11-year-old 5th grade male with autism spectrum disorder–elementary (p. #4) [general]
      • Includes information on content and standards
      • Includes adaptive and cognitive functioning scores
      • Includes information on special education services received
    • 16-year-old 10th grader (no name or gender) in a self-contained special education classroom for most classes–high school (p. #5) [general]
      • Includes information on content and standards
      • Includes information on placement
      • Includes cognitive functioning score
      • Includes information on post-graduation goals
Michigan

https://mdoe.state.mi.us/mdedocuments/AssessmentSelectionGuidelinesTraining/page759.html

  • Training site with six online interactive student case studies

https://mdoe.state.mi.us/mdedocuments/AssessmentSelectionGuidelinesTraining/Assessment%20Selection%20Guidance-Case%20Studies.pdf

  • The same six student case studies in the training site provided as PDF files
    • 12-year-old 7th grade male with specific learning disability–middle school (p. #1) [general]
      • Includes information about academics and standards
      • Includes information about post-graduation goals
      • Includes information about extracurriculars
    • 9-year-old 3rd grade female with cognitive impairment–elementary (p. #2) [alternate]
      • Includes information about special education services received and placement
      • Includes information about academics and standards
      • Includes information about communication
    • 12-year-old 6th grade male with autism spectrum disorder–middle school (p. #3) [alternate ELA, general mathematics]
      • Includes information about special education services received and placement
      • Includes information about academics and standards
    • 9-year-old 3rd grade male in a self-contained special education program located in a center-based program–elementary (p. #4) [alternate]
      • Includes information about special education services received and placement
      • Includes information about communication
      • Includes information about academics and standards
    • 16-year-old 10th grade male in a self-contained special education classroom–high school (p. #5) [alternate]
      • Includes information about special education services received and placement
      • Includes information about academics and standards
      • Includes information about post-graduation goals
    • 8-year-old 2nd grade female with specific learning disability–elementary (p. #6) [general]
      • Includes information about past assessment scores
      • Includes information about special education services received and placement
      • Includes information about communication
Rhode Island

https://www.ride.ri.gov/Portals/0/Uploads/Documents/Instruction-and-Assessment-World-Class-Standards/Assessment/Eligibility_Presentation_Pawtucket_2018-19_3.14.2019.pptx?ver=2019-12-20-094138-917

  • Download and open PowerPoint Presentation (“Eligibility Presentation Pawtucket 2018-19”). See Slide #27 for one student case study example.
    • Zack, 4th grader with autism spectrum disorder–elementary (insufficient information to make a determination)
      • Includes information on special education services received
      • Includes information on placement
      • Includes information on communication
South Dakota

https://doe.sd.gov/assessment/documents/Alt-Guidelines-20.pdf

  • Guidance document with three examples (pages 13-19)
    • Student Example A (p. #13): 13-year-old male with autism spectrum disorder–middle school (general)
      • Includes information about academics and standards
      • Includes information about communication
    • Student Example B (p. #15): 9-year-old female with autism spectrum disorder–elementary (alternate)
      • Includes information about academics and standards
      • Includes information about communication
      • Includes intelligence score
    • Student Example C (p. #17): 17-year-old male with autism spectrum disorder–high school (alternate)
      • Includes information about academics and standards
      • Includes information about communication
      • Includes information about placement
Washington

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Us45b_0Xf59DmK7iYRtS0iJiZiSvgrjT?usp=sharing

  • Profile developed by state and not available on public website
  • Google Drive folder with a “David’s Story_WA” document and a “David’s Score Profiles_WA” document. First read David’s story; then, examine David’s score profiles.
    • David, 5th grader with autism spectrum disorder–elementary (insufficient information to make a determination, use for discussion in training)
      • Includes information on special education services received and placement
      • Includes information on IEP goals
      • Includes information on history of past assessments

 

Table 2 provides an easy way to access student profiles by school level for states and districts providing professional development to educators working within one school level. Each link in this table is to the state with a student profile at that level. These links go to state entries in Table 1 where the specific student profile can be identified and accessed. States may have student profiles at more than one level, so the reader should use grade information to determine the school level.

Table 2. Student Profiles by School Level

Elementary School Middle School High School
Alabama (1 example) Alabama (1 example) Arizona (1 example)
Arizona (3 examples) Arizona (1 examples) Hawaii (1 example)
Hawaii (1 example) Georgia (1 example) Kentucky (1 example)
Kentucky (4 examples) Hawaii (5 examples) Louisiana (1 example)
Louisiana (2 examples) Kentucky (3 examples) Michigan (1 example)
Michigan (3 examples) Michigan (2 examples) South Dakota (1 example)
Rhode Island (1 example) South Dakota (1 example)  
South Dakota (1 example)    
Washington (1 example)    

 

Table 3 provides an easy way to access student profiles by category of disability (as well as grade level within each category). States and districts emphasizing decisions for students in a particular category can use the links in this table to find the student profiles in each category. Each link in this table is to the state with a student profile for a student with that categorical label. States may have student profiles for students in more than one category, so the reader should use the category label to determine which profiles to use.

Table 3. Student Profiles by Disability
Note: Some students’ disability types were not identified by the state.

Intellectual
Disability
Autism Spectrum
Disorder
Developmental
Delay
Specific Learning
Disability
Multiple Disabilities
Alabama (7th grade) Alabama (4th grade) Arizona (2nd grade) Arizona (5th grade) Arizona (10th grade)
Kentucky (3rd, 5th, 7th, and 8th grade) Arizona (7th grade)   Michigan (2nd and 7th grade) Georgia (6th grade)
Michigan (3rd grade) Kentucky (4th and 6th grade)     Kentucky (10th grade)
  Louisiana (5th grade)      
  Michigan (6th grade)      
  Rhode Island (4th grade)      
  South Dakota (ages 9, 13, and 17)      
  Washington (5th grade)      

 

Table 4 identifies the available student profiles for students with disabilities who are also English learners. States and districts emphasizing decisions for English learners with disabilities can use the links in this table to find the student profiles for these students. Each link in this table is to the state with a student profile for an English learner. States may have student profiles for several students, so the reader should use the grade level in Table 4 to determine which profile to use.

Table 4. Student Profiles of English Learners with Disabilities

Arizona (4th grade)
Kentucky (5th grade, mild mental disability)


1 5th graders are considered elementary school level in this resource.