Appendix A
Material Used for the Verification Process
Example letter to Assessment Director and Special Education Director.
Re: NCEO verification request for public reporting
[Name],
The National Center on Educational Outcomes is examining states’ public reports for the 2012-2013 school
year assessment results. Our goal is to:
(a) identify all components of each state’s testing system;
(b) determine whether each state reports disaggregated test results for students with
disabilities and English language learners (ELLs) with disabilities; and
(c) describe the way participation and performance information is presented.
As in previous years, we are looking at assessment department reports and the equivalent of report cards
used for ESEA.
We have reviewed your Web site for this information and have enclosed tables summarizing that review. Please
verify all included information. Specifically, please return the tables that we have attached,
noting your changes to them. Also, if there is additional publicly reported information available
for your state, please provide us with the public document and/or website that contains the
information. Address your responses to Deb Albus via email albus001@umn.edu.
If you have any questions about our request, please email Deb Albus or call at (612) 626-0323. Please respond
by August 1, 2014.
Thank you for taking the time to provide this information.
Martha Thurlow, Director NCEO
Deb Albus, Research Fellow, NCEO
2012-2013 Example Verification Tables Sent to a State
Disaggregated Data for Students with Disabilities on Regular Assessment
Table 1. Disaggregated Data for the Regular Assessment
State
|
Regular
Assessment
|
Grade
|
Subject
Areas
|
Disaggregated Data
|
Inside
ESEA
(Y/N)
|
Special Education
|
ELLs with Disabilities
|
Participation
|
Performance
|
Participation
|
Performance
|
Alabama |
AL Reading and Mathematics
Test (ARMT+) |
3-8 |
Reading, Math |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
|
AL Science Assessment (ASA) |
5,7 |
Science |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
|
AL High School Graduation
Exam (AHSGE) |
11, 12 |
Biology, Language, Math,
Reading, Social Sciences |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
How States Reported Participation Data for Students with Disabilities for Regular Assessments (In ESEA)
Table 2. Ways States Disaggregated Participation Rate
States
|
Participation Rate Reported
|
Number of
Approaches Used
|
Denominator for
the Participation
Rate
|
By Grade
and by Test
|
Merged Grades;
By Test
|
By Grade;
Merged Tests
|
Merged Grades
and Tests
|
Alabama |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
1 |
No |
Table 3. How Participation was Reported
State
|
Participation Data Reported On Regular Assessments
|
Number
Enrolled/Eligible
to be Tested
|
Number of
Students Tested
|
Number of Students
Not Tested
|
Percent Participating
in Test
|
Percent of Students
not Tested
|
Number of Students
with Scores
|
Number of Students
with No scores
|
Percent of Students
with No Scores
|
Alabama |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes1 |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
1 The state reports percent tested and percent of tested students the group represents
How States Reported Performance Data for Students with Disabilities for Regular Assessments (In ESEA)
Table 4. Ways States Disaggregated Performance Data
States
|
Reporting Some Data
by Grade and Test
|
Grades Merged for
One or More Tests
|
Merged Tests for
One or More Grades
|
Merged Grades
and Test
|
Number of
Approaches Used
|
Alabama |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
1 |
Table 5. How Performance was Reported
State
|
Performance Data Reported for Regular Assessments
|
Percent Proficient
|
Percent Proficient Derived
|
Percent Not Proficient
|
Number Proficient
|
Number Not Proficient
|
Number by Achievement Level
|
Percent by Achievement Level
|
Percentile Rank
|
Alabama |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
Yes (by accom status only) |
Yes |
NA |
Participation and Performance Data for Students with Disabilities, Alternate Assessment on Alternate Achievement Standards
Table 6. Disaggregated Data for the AA-AAS
State
|
AA-AAS
|
Grade
|
Subject Areas
|
Disaggregated Data
|
Inside
ESEA
(Y/N)
|
Special Education
|
ELLs with Disabilities
|
Partici-
pation
|
Perform-
ance
|
Partici-
pation
|
Perform-
ance
|
Alabama |
AL Alternate Assessment (AAA) |
3-8, 11
5,7,11 |
Reading, Math
Science |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
How States Reported Participation and Performance Data for Students with Disabilities on AA-AAS (In ESEA)
Table 7. How Participation was Reported
State
|
Participation Data Reported On AA-AAS
|
Number
Enrolled/
Eligible to
be Tested
|
Number of Students Tested
|
Number of Students
Not Tested
|
Percent Participating
in Test
|
Percent of Students
not Tested
|
Number of Students
with Scores
|
Number of Students
with No
scores
|
Percent of Students
with No
Scores
|
Alabama |
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes1 |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
1 The state reports percent tested and percent of tested students the group represents
Table 8. How Performance was Reported
State
|
Performance Data Reported for AA-AAS
|
Percent Proficient
|
Percent
Proficient
Derived
|
Percent Not Proficient
|
Number Proficient
|
Number Not Proficient
|
Number by Achievement
Level
|
Percent by Achievement
Level
|
Alabama |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Participation and Performance Data for Students with Disabilities, English Language Proficiency Assessment (ELPA)
Table 9. Disaggregated Data for the English Language Proficiency Assessment
State |
ELPA Name |
Grade |
Disaggregated Data for ELLs with Disabilities |
Participation
|
Performance
|
Alabama |
ACCESS for ELLs |
K-12 |
No |
No |
Accommodations Data
Table 10. Number of States Reporting Participation and Performance by Accommodated Condition for Any Student Population
State
|
Test
|
Accommodation Data Reported
|
States with
Participation Only
|
States with
Performance Only
|
Both Participation
and Performance
|
Alabama |
Regular Assessment, with and without
accommodations and
Alternate Assessment
without accommodations |
No |
No |
Yes |
Top of page |