Appendix A

Material Used for the Verification Process

Example letter to Assessment Director and Special Education Director.

Re: NCEO verification request for public reporting

[Name],

The National Center on Educational Outcomes is examining states’ public reports for the 2012-2013 school
year assessment results. Our goal is to:

(a) identify all components of each state’s testing system;
(b) determine whether each state reports disaggregated test results for students with
      disabilities and English language learners (ELLs) with disabilities; and
(c) describe the way participation and performance information is presented.  

As in previous years, we are looking at assessment department reports and the equivalent of report cards
used for ESEA.

We have reviewed your Web site for this information and have enclosed tables summarizing that review. Please
verify all included information. Specifically, please return the tables that we have attached,
noting your changes to them. Also, if there is additional publicly reported information available
for your state, please provide us with the public document and/or website that contains the
information.
Address your responses to Deb Albus via email albus001@umn.edu.

If you have any questions about our request, please email Deb Albus or call at (612) 626-0323. Please respond
by August 1, 2014.

Thank you for taking the time to provide this information.

Martha Thurlow, Director NCEO

Deb Albus, Research Fellow, NCEO

 

2012-2013 Example Verification Tables Sent to a State

Disaggregated Data for Students with Disabilities on Regular Assessment

Table 1. Disaggregated Data for the Regular Assessment

State

Regular
Assessment

Grade

Subject
Areas

Disaggregated Data

Inside
ESEA
(Y/N)

Special Education

ELLs with Disabilities

Participation

Performance

Participation

Performance

Alabama

AL Reading and Mathematics
Test (ARMT+)

3-8

Reading, Math

Yes

Yes

No

No

Yes

AL Science Assessment (ASA)

5,7

Science

Yes

Yes

No

No

Yes

AL High School Graduation
Exam (AHSGE)

11, 12

Biology, Language, Math,
Reading, Social Sciences

Yes

Yes

No

No

Yes

How States Reported Participation Data for Students with Disabilities for Regular Assessments (In ESEA)

Table 2. Ways States Disaggregated Participation Rate

States

Participation Rate Reported

Number of
Approaches Used

Denominator for
the Participation
Rate

By Grade
and by Test

Merged Grades;
By Test

By Grade;
Merged Tests

Merged Grades
and Tests

Alabama

Yes

No

No

No

1

No

 

Table 3. How Participation was Reported

State

Participation Data Reported On Regular Assessments

Number
Enrolled/Eligible
to be Tested

Number of
Students Tested

Number of Students
Not Tested

Percent Participating
in Test

Percent of Students
not Tested

Number of Students
with Scores

Number of Students
with No scores

Percent of Students
with No Scores

Alabama

No

Yes

Yes

Yes1

No

Yes

Yes

No

1 The state reports percent tested and percent of tested students the group represents

 

How States Reported Performance Data for Students with Disabilities for Regular Assessments (In ESEA)

Table 4. Ways States Disaggregated Performance Data

States

Reporting Some Data
by Grade and Test

Grades Merged for
One or More Tests

Merged Tests for
One or More Grades

Merged Grades
and Test

Number of
Approaches Used

Alabama

Yes

No

No

No

1

 

Table 5. How Performance was Reported

State

Performance Data Reported for Regular Assessments

Percent Proficient

Percent Proficient Derived

Percent Not Proficient

Number Proficient

Number Not Proficient

Number by Achievement Level

Percent by Achievement Level

Percentile Rank

Alabama

No

Yes

No

No

No

Yes (by accom status only)

Yes

NA

Participation and Performance Data for Students with Disabilities, Alternate Assessment on Alternate Achievement Standards

Table 6. Disaggregated Data for the AA-AAS

State

AA-AAS

Grade

Subject Areas

Disaggregated Data

Inside
ESEA
(Y/N)

Special Education

ELLs with Disabilities

Partici-
pation

Perform-
ance

Partici-
pation

Perform-
ance

Alabama

AL Alternate Assessment (AAA)

3-8, 11

5,7,11

Reading, Math
Science

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

How States Reported Participation and Performance Data for Students with Disabilities on AA-AAS (In ESEA)

Table 7. How Participation was Reported

State

Participation Data Reported On AA-AAS

Number
Enrolled/
Eligible to
be Tested

Number of Students Tested

Number of Students
Not Tested

Percent Participating
in Test

Percent of Students
not Tested

Number of Students
with Scores

Number of Students
with No
scores

Percent of Students
with No
Scores

Alabama

No

Yes

No

Yes1

No

Yes

No

No

1 The state reports percent tested and percent of tested students the group represents

 

Table 8. How Performance was Reported

State

Performance Data Reported for AA-AAS

Percent Proficient

Percent
Proficient
Derived

Percent Not Proficient

Number Proficient

Number Not Proficient

Number by Achievement
Level

Percent by Achievement
Level

Alabama

No

Yes

No

No

No

Yes

Yes

Participation and Performance Data for Students with Disabilities, English Language Proficiency Assessment (ELPA)

Table 9. Disaggregated Data for the English Language Proficiency Assessment

State

ELPA Name

Grade

Disaggregated Data for ELLs with Disabilities

Participation

Performance

Alabama

ACCESS for ELLs

K-12

No

No

Accommodations Data

Table 10. Number of States Reporting Participation and Performance by Accommodated Condition for Any Student Population

State

Test

Accommodation Data Reported

States with
Participation Only

States with
Performance Only

Both Participation
and Performance

Alabama

Regular Assessment, with and without
accommodations and Alternate Assessment
without accommodations

No

No

Yes